Jennifer Aniston recently posed naked for the cover of GQ magazine, so here it is. Why? Because I have a cock and a pulse, that's why (although yes, I'd still pick Jolie if I had the choice). Enjoy.
Aniston blows Jolie away. I'm glad she posed nude. It doesn't bother me all, in case some people think it's beneath her, etc. She's always been classy, and she just looks fabulous.
Don, on a scale of pure sexiness, I'm afraid I have to go with Jolie; Aniston is hot all day in that girl next door kind of way (which I absolutely love, hence her picture being posted here) but Jolie gives you the impression that she's going to do something to you that Aniston might balk at.I'm not saying that it's a fair comparison (some girls just don't have the lips/tongues/stomach for such things) but when it comes to famous, impossibly beautiful women that I have no chance with, I have to go with the sexy super-freak; I have girls living next door to me as it is.
I'd go with Aniston actually...Sex with Jolie would be great, don't get me wrong, but it would be a level of abstraction about it... like "oh wow I'm having sex with Angeline Jolie".Whereas with Aniston it would be just what it is, and we'd share a joke afterwards.Dunno if that makes sense.
I hear you, Van Zan; I guess I'm in it for the unique experience: something I can only share with a handful of people. I've had the "Aniston" experience many times; Jolie is still an exotic fantasy, I guess.
Why subscribe when you can buy single copies?And what's wrong with Sarah Palin?;-)Joking aside, both Aniston and Jolie are very attractive, but I still prefer Megan Fox.
I go with Aniston, because she has some meat on her bones. Jolie is a bit too anorexic for my tastes.
Post a Comment